What is actually Anyone finding great precision with for 180gr supplements and 4831? Just in search of a starting point so I do not squander lots of factors. Thanks for the assistance!
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was building extra stress and was slower in comparison to the old stuff. I don't remember if I even experimented with common h4831 or not; I am considering not. Simply click to develop...
Liberalism; The impossible however acknowledged notion that it is fully attainable to pick up a turd because of the clear conclusion.
243, and a number of the loads I have started out with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises when the H-4831sc loads display a shotgun pattern! Who knows, I just may well find a use for it In any case.
INgunner54 stated: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some groups.
I know, rough moments. H4831SC will certainly work, I just failed to like the case density when loaded lengthy. I do not recall powder charge off the very best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which happens to be where by I usually goal to be. With your circumstance using what you have got (and what I should have accomplished) I'd personally start with the top in the bearing area on the bullet ideal in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you finally look for a velocity node.
I have used both and made use of the very same fees and have not been in a position to tell any noticable dissimilarities with general performance. the SC Model meters just a little smoother is about all. any comments??
and you might like to spend money on some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does alter through the years. 4831 powder of several years ago is not very same as exactly what is currently available. that's why someone seriously interested in reloading safely and securely should h4831sc have probably the most existing load data publications to confer with.
dioni.a.312 said: In my expertise the only real real distinction would be that the shortcut meters superior by reloading machines. When It can be loaded theres no purposeful difference. I've heard which the shortcut could have a very small little bit more quickly burn amount but it seems insignificant. Simply click to develop...
Liberalism; The not possible nonetheless approved notion that it's totally feasible to select up a turd through the clean up conclude.
Kansas Town, MO I'd grab what ever is accessible at this time. h4831 vs h4831sc I’ve utilized both though with my drop by load and didn’t see anything at all unique performance sensible.
The "SC" means Quick Minimize. I have not observed a distinction between both powder dut I do not think I would blend them.
I am aware the H4831SC provides a far h4831sc load data better load density But I feel I have enough place in my case for the normal H4831.
I sawed a person in 50 percent to determine how thick the jackets were being, and so they were quickly twice as thick to be a 50-grain hollow issue was. Ditto to the 64-grain Electrical power Point, as these bullets are designed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know all the things I learn about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know everything at all with regards to the 223. I question that you're going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but let us understand how it goes.